Loading
NEWS BUSINESS EDUCATION SIGHTSEEING

Search

:

▼ This Study Claims Even One Drink A Day Could Increase Cancer Risk

  • Category:Other
kgaki4tc4errfiwexeb4_320_320-6714ac50.jpg

NDTV



 

The research conducted by The University of Tokyo revealed that people who drank two or fewer drinks a day still had an elevated cancer risk.


Excessive alcohol consumption is dangerous for health, we all know it. It casts a serious risk of liver damage, heart problem and many other health issues. That's why we are always advised to drink in moderation. Those who are everyday drinkers are specifically advised to limit the consumption to not more than two drinks.

We have often heard and read that having 1-2 drinks a day poses no threat to our health; but the results of a new study suggest otherwise.

Researchers in Japan have found that even light alcohol consumption might increase the risk of cancer. So, a couple of drinks every day (that we always thought to be harmless) may not be really a good idea. 

The research conducted by The University of Tokyo revealed that people who drank two or fewer drinks a day still had an elevated cancer risk regardless of how long they had consumed alcohol. The analyses were also classified by sex, drinking/smoking behaviours and occupational class, and displayed the same patterns. The results were published in the journal Cancer. 

Masayoshi Zaitsu, one of the researchers from The University of Tokyo, said, "In Japan, the primary cause of death is cancer. Given the current burden of overall cancer incidence, we should further encourage promoting public education about alcohol-related cancer risk.

The researchers analysed data of 63,232 people dealing with cancer, procured from 33 general hospitals in Japan. All the patients divulged their average daily amount of standardised alcohol units and the duration of alcohol consumption. The team discovered a linear association between cancer risk and alcohol consumption.

The study gives some noteworthy warning signals to us. It found that the overall cancer risk appeared to be the lowest at zero alcohol consumption. The elevated risk could be blamed at alcohol-related cancer risk across relatively common sites, including the colorectum, stomach, breast, prostate and esophagus.
 

 

Comment(s) Write comment

Grateful for posts like this one, they remind me there are still places online run by people who care about quality, and a look at <a href="http://jasperjoy.shop" />jasperjoy</a> reflected the same standards, you can tell the difference between content made for readers and content made just for search engines today and this is the former.
Started reading without much expectation and ended on a high note, and a look at <a href="http://roamroot.shop" />roamroot</a> continued that arc, content that builds rather than peaks early is a sign of a writer who knows how to structure a piece for sustained reader engagement rather than relying on a strong hook to do all the work.
Reading this slowly because the writing rewards a slower pace, and a stop at <a href="http://yonderyard.shop" />yonderyard</a> did the same, the pace at which I read content is something I now use as a quality signal and writing that earns a slower pace earns my attention as a reader looking for substance these days.
Generally I do not leave comments but this post merits a small note, and a stop at <a href="http://trendycartspace.shop" />trendycartspace</a> extended that comment worthy quality, the urge to actively contribute to a sites community rather than passively consume from it is something specific content provokes and this site has provoked that engagement urge from me today.
Once I had read three posts the editorial pattern was clear, and a look at <a href="http://warewelly.shop" />warewelly</a> confirmed the pattern from a fourth angle, sites where the underlying approach reveals itself through accumulated reading rather than being announced are sites with real depth and this one has that quality clearly visible across multiple pieces consistently.
During a reading session that included several other sources this one stood out, and a look at <a href="http://blog44authors.shop" />blog44authors</a> continued the standout quality, the side by side comparison of sources during research is a useful exercise and this site has been winning those comparisons for me consistently across multiple research sessions during the last week.
Skimmed first and then went back to read carefully, and the careful read paid off in places I had missed, and a stop at <a href="http://devfalls.shop" />devfalls</a> got the same treatment, the rare site whose content rewards a second pass is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable single read articles.
Saving the link for sure, this one is a keeper, and a look at <a href="http://blogpom.shop" />blogpom</a> confirmed I should bookmark the entire site rather than just this page, the consistency across what I have seen so far suggests there is a lot more here worth coming back for soon when I have more time.
Reading this prompted a small note in my reference file, and a stop at <a href="http://flowdeskz.shop" />flowdeskz</a> prompted another, the rare site that contributes useful nuggets to my own working knowledge rather than just consuming my attention is worth the time investment many times over compared to the usual pile of forgettable scroll content.
Pass this along to colleagues if the topic comes up, the framing here is sensible, and a stop at <a href="http://goofysfood.shop" />goofysfood</a> adds more useful angles to share, the kind of content that improves conversations rather than just feeding them is what makes a resource genuinely valuable in professional contexts going forward over time and across project boundaries too.
Worth saying that the writing carries a particular kind of authority without making any explicit claims to it, and a stop at <a href="http://xenoapp.shop" />xenoapp</a> extended that earned authority feeling, sites that demonstrate expertise through the quality of their explanations rather than by stating credentials are sites I trust most and this site has it.
Reading carefully this time rather than scanning, and the depth shows up in places I missed first time around, and a look at <a href="http://blog66generation.shop" />blog66generation</a> rewarded the same careful approach, content that holds up to multiple reads is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable scroll fodder daily.
Definitely returning here, that is decided, and a look at <a href="http://blog33rate.shop" />blog33rate</a> only made the case stronger, this is one of those rare websites that rewards regular visits rather than feeling stale after the first read which is something I cannot say about most of the places I bookmark today across all my topics.
Most attempts at writing on this topic feel like they are missing something and this post finally identified what was missing, and a look at <a href="http://apexware.shop" />apexware</a> extended that diagnostic clarity, content that names what is wrong with adjacent treatments while doing better itself is content with both critical and constructive value and this site has both.
Different feel from the algorithmically optimised posts that dominate the topic, and a stop at <a href="http://appolive.shop" />appolive</a> reinforced that human touch, you can tell when a site is being run by someone who reads what they publish versus someone just hitting submit and moving on quickly to the next assignment without checking the result.
Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next

Trackback (You need to login.)